Fix the criteria before the first interview
Write the rating grid rows from the role requirements, once, and use them for every candidate. Criteria invented after meeting someone are how bias enters a process.
An interview scorecard exists to stop the loudest person in the debrief deciding the hire. Every interviewer rates the same criteria, on the same scale, and submits before the group talks, which is the part that makes it work.
Not a stock template. Build it in a few minutes from a blank form, or describe it and let AI draft the questions on a paid plan.
The scoring is the mechanical bit and Questionful does it for you: give the criteria point values and each evaluation arrives with a total attached, so the debrief starts from numbers rather than impressions.
A starting point, not a rulebook: every question below is a real Questionful question type, and all of them are editable once the form is in your account.
| Question | Question type |
|---|---|
| Candidate name | Short answer |
| Which role and stage? Branch if stages score different criteria | Dropdown |
| Your name | Short answer |
| Rate the candidate on each criterion The core of the scorecard | Rating grid |
| Strongest evidence you saw | Paragraph |
| Biggest concern | Paragraph |
| Would you work with this person? Give it points. It is the honest signal | Multiple choice |
| Overall recommendation Strong yes / yes / no / strong no | Multiple choice |
Write the rating grid rows from the role requirements, once, and use them for every candidate. Criteria invented after meeting someone are how bias enters a process.
Point values on the closed-set questions produce a total on submission, so no one is adding up scorecards by hand before a debrief.
Share the link and ask for it within an hour of the interview. Scores collected after the debrief are the debrief, written down.
Two short open questions (strongest evidence, biggest concern) give the debrief something specific to argue about, and the export gives you a record if a decision is ever questioned.
Yes. Attach point values to the rating grid and the recommendation question, and each submitted evaluation arrives with a total. Written answers stay for humans to read.
Yes. Make the stage a dropdown and route each choice to a section with that stage's criteria.
Not through the form, respondents see only their own submission. Anyone with access to the form in your workspace can see all responses, which is the intended split.
By webhook. Every evaluation POSTs as JSON to any endpoint, so an ATS that accepts webhooks, directly or via Zapier or Make, can attach it to the candidate.
19 types, including specialist ones most builders skip.
FeatureRoute each answer choice to its own section, so people only see what applies.
FeatureEvery response POSTed as JSON to any endpoint, signed if you want it.
TemplateStructured candidate intake with a CV upload and screening questions.
TemplateAsk what would have kept them, while they will still tell you.
TemplateCollect everything a new starter needs to be set up on day one.
Use caseReplace the CV inbox with a structured application form: same questions for everyone, CV attached, and every submission comparable.
Unlimited forms and 100 responses a month, free. Paid plans from €19.
No credit card required.
Choose which cookies you allow. Strictly necessary cookies are always on because the site cannot function without them.
Required for core features such as security, load balancing and remembering this cookie choice. These set no tracking cookies.
Google Analytics, used to understand traffic and improve the site. Loaded only if you allow it.